Kyoto University Emissions Tax

Kyoto University Law Department 1933Kyoto is famous in Japan for many things, in the past for classic temples like Kinkakuji and Kiyomizu-dera and for being the capital of Japan from 794 until the Meiji Restoration in 1868. It is well-known more recently for things such as the Kyoto Protocol and Kyoto University. This week, Kyoto University became the first University in Japan to introduce a so-called “University Environment Tax”, sort of an emissions tax to attempt to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases within the University.

The idea is that the amount of energy used by each department is calculated and taxed at a flat rate by the University. The gathered taxes are then reinvested back into the University’s environmental efforts. On top of being taxed, those departments, offices or labs whose usage is above the average will be required to establish some form of system of method to decrease their output. On top of this, they are planning to create an inter-University market for the trading of “carbon credits”. This means that for example if one department is putting out extremely low emissions, they can trade their remaining capacity to a more heavy usage department, maximizing the use of the quotas, and creating new income for the more efficient department.

Under the Kyoto Protocol, Japan is required to reduce its CO2 emissions by 6% by 2012, and the Government has been active in offering up ideas of how this could be realized. One of these includes a national Environment Tax, of which various proposals have been submitted to the Environment Ministry with limited success. This new University Tax by Kyoto University represents a miniature version of that proposed inside the Government. The Kyoto Protocol seems to be a positive initiative against climate change, and indeed since it first came into effect in 1990, Japan has reduced its emissions by 3.5%. Japan is of course one of the majority of developed countries that have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol. In fact, the only backwards countries that refuse to ratify, are the red ones below (USA and Australia):

Kyoto Protocol Participation (smaller)

I was lucky enough to be able to attend Kyoto University for a couple of years, and from my recollection, they may have some difficulties in cutting their energy costs. Coming from a modern Western University, I was shocked at the lecture halls, which were spartan concrete buildings, with 100 year old wooden benches. The wind and noise would seep in from the outside, and at times it was difficult to tell whether you were actually inside a hall or outside in the elements. These lecture halls were very modest compared to the plush carpeted lecture halls back home, or for that matter the private Universities up the road.

Kyoto University Law Department Now
Kyoto University Law Department: Today

The obvious answer would be to renovate these halls, and surely they would be able to cut down on heating and cooling costs in Japan’s more extreme seasons? Well no, there were no heaters or air conditioners in any of the lecture halls. My most vivid memory of this time was cycling into exams in February through the snow, wrapped up in layers upon layers of sweaters and coats, with gloves, scarf, beanie etc. And sitting down to sit final exams, not being able to take any off as it was so cold! It was as if we were taking exams outside, my fingers were completely frozen. Mid-terms in August/September were just as bad, 35+ degrees, and no air conditioner. It may have been a pleasant place to take an exam, if I wasn’t dripping sweat all over the table and exam paper, and taking 2 liters of Pocari Sweat to each exam! I remember thinking how could they possibly decide to have exams right in the middle of summer and winter, as opposed to the wonderful seasons of spring and autumn. And also, with Kyoto University being the largest recipient of research funds of any University in Japan, why don’t they buy some air conditioners!

I am very much in favour of Kyoto University supporting the local efforts of the Kyoto Protocol. It will no doubt stimulate good debate and new research in both the environmental and economic departments. However if the current students are anything like me, perhaps the first this they will want to do will be to allocate some of that University Environment Tax to improving the environment of the students, by adding a couple of air conditioners?

4 thoughts on “Kyoto University Emissions Tax”

  1. Hahahaha!!!

    Don’t know in which department you studied, but things are not that bad at Engineering (buildings 1, 2, 5 and 8) and GES (building 9) at Yoshida Campus. A/C equipments are present at all rooms. By the way, there’s a new campus at Katsura for Engineering and Architecture. State of the art. Beautiful place.

    Old buildings at Yoshida are being refurbished now, because they don’t comply with the new anti-seismic legislation (after Kobe 95). I suppose that, as part of this work, they’re installing A/C on all buildings that didn’t have one already.

    As part of the GES (Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies) I’m more than happy to hear that this plan was given green light.

    Greetings from Kyoto.

  2. Ah the memories. I, too, studied at a Japanese University. A public one at that. And yes, just like you, have fond memories of the lack of any sort of air conditioning at all. I remember being forced to write essays in pencil in the middle of summer, and wondering how on earth the sensei could read my response after the pencil scribbllings were marred by the sweat pouring off of my forehead. My University was also supposed to be a big beneficiary of public funds but it certainly wasn’t obvious how that money was being used. Slush funds for the 教授 maybe?

  3. Strange. So you’re saying that (a) they are trying to cut emissions but (b) they are spending loads of yen on buying new airconditioners and heaters for the campus. In what other areas would they have a greenhouse footprint anyway?
    Minor details aside it is nice to see some institutions finally doing something about the problem. Even though Kyoto University is probably only a drop in the ocean, hopefuly it will ring bells with law makers going forward. It would be even better if they used real emission credits. Is that possible? Why not, I guess. It’s not as if it is only countries are the only people who can buy and sell emission credits – I’ve heard of a bunch of speculators trading them, too. Surely Kyoto U should buy its footprint in real credits and enable its facilties to trade them on the open market. That way the economics faculty (if it wasn’t filled with so many left wing theorists) might actually make a profit going forward! At the end of the day, what use is an internally compatible system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *